Stage-Specific Pathways of Leishmania infantum chagasi Entry and Phagosome Maturation in Macrophages

The life stages of Leishmania spp. include the infectious promastigote and the replicative intracellular amastigote. Each stage is phagocytosed by macrophages during the parasite life cycle. We previously showed that caveolae, a subset of cholesterol-rich membrane lipid rafts, facilitate uptake and intracellular survival of virulent promastigotes by macrophages, at least in part, by delaying parasitophorous vacuole (PV)-lysosome fusion. We hypothesized that amastigotes and promastigotes would differ in their route of macrophage entry and mechanism of PV maturation. Indeed, transient disruption of macrophage lipid rafts decreased the entry of promastigotes, but not amastigotes, into macrophages (P<0.001). Promastigote-containing PVs were positive for caveolin-1, and co-localized transiently with EEA-1 and Rab5 at 5 minutes. Amastigote-generated PVs lacked caveolin-1 but retained Rab5 and EEA-1 for at least 30 minutes or 2 hours, respectively. Coinciding with their conversion into amastigotes, the number of promastigote PVs positive for LAMP-1 increased from 20% at 1 hour, to 46% by 24 hours, (P<0.001, Chi square). In contrast, more than 80% of amastigote-initiated PVs were LAMP-1+ at both 1 and 24 hours. Furthermore, lipid raft disruption increased LAMP-1 recruitment to promastigote, but not to amastigote-containing compartments. Overall, our data showed that promastigotes enter macrophages through cholesterol-rich domains like caveolae to delay fusion with lysosomes. In contrast, amastigotes enter through a non-caveolae pathway, and their PVs rapidly fuse with late endosomes but prolong their association with early endosome markers. These results suggest a model in which promastigotes and amastigotes use different mechanisms to enter macrophages, modulate the kinetics of phagosome maturation, and facilitate their intracellular survival

Combining High-Resolution Gas Chromatographic Continuous Fraction Collection with Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy: Possibilities of Analyzing a Whole GC Chromatogram

This study presents, for the first time, the successful application of analyzing a whole gas chromatography (GC) chromatogram by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy using a continuous repeatable and stable (n = 280) high-resolution (HR) GC fractionation platform with a 96-well plate. Typically with GC- or liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis, (isomer) standards and/or additional NMR analysis are needed to confirm the identification and/or structure of the analyte of interest. In the case of complex substances (e.g., UVCBs), isomer standards are often unavailable and NMR spectra too complex to achieve this. This proof of concept study shows that a HR GC fractionation collection platform was successfully applied to separate, purify, and enrich isomers in complex substances from a whole GC chromatogram, which would facilitate NMR analysis. As a model substance, a chlorinated paraffin (CP) mixture (>8,000 isomers) was chosen. NMR spectra were obtained from all 96 collected fractions, which provides important information for unravelling their full structure. As a proof of concept, a spectral interpretation of a few NMR spectra was made to assign sub-structures. More research is ongoing for the full characterization of CP isomers using multivariate statistical analysis. For the first time, up to only a few CP isomers per fraction were isolated from a highly complex mixture. These may be further purified and certified as standards, which are urgently needed, and can also be used for persistency, bioaccumulation, or toxicity studies

SAR exploration of the non-imidazole histamine H3 receptor ligand ZEL-H16 reveals potent inverse agonism

Histamine H3 receptor (H3R) agonists without an imidazole moiety remain very scarce. Of these, ZEL-H16 (1) has been reported previously as a high-affinity non-imidazole H3R (partial) agonist. Our structure-activity relationship analysis using derivatives of 1 identified both basic moieties as key interaction motifs and the distance of these from the central core as a determinant for H3R affinity. However, in spite of the reported H3R (partial) agonism, in our hands, 1 acts as an inverse agonist for Gαi signaling in a CRE-luciferase reporter gene assay and using an H3R conformational sensor. Inverse agonism was also observed for all of the synthesized derivatives of 1. Docking studies and molecular dynamics simulations suggest ionic interactions/hydrogen bonds to H3R residues D1143.32 and E2065.46 as essential interaction points